iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) share 52 holdings, with roughly 19.5% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: DGRO October 30, 2026 · SCHG November 5, 2026.
Fund pages: DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) · SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF)
Weight overlap
19.5%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
52
Securities in both funds
Funds
DGRO · SCHG
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In DGRO | In SCHG | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 3.04% | 9.99% | 6.94%SCHG |
| AAPLAPPLE | 3.04% | 12.61% | 9.57%SCHG |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 2.40% | 3.81% | 1.41%SCHG |
| LLYELI LILLY | 1.48% | 3.18% | 1.70%SCHG |
| VVISA | 1.09% | 2.10% | 1.01%SCHG |
| UNHUNITEDHEALTH GROUP | 1.85% | 1.03% | 0.82%DGRO |
| LINLINDE | 0.69% | 0.70% | 0.01%SCHG |
| MAMASTERCARD | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.88%SCHG |
| COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE | 0.63% | 1.38% | 0.75%SCHG |
| CATCATERPILLAR | 0.50% | 0.74% | 0.24%SCHG |
| BLKBlackRock Finance Inc | 0.71% | 0.49% | 0.22%DGRO |
| DEDEERE + | 0.34% | 0.48% | 0.14%SCHG |
| ETNEATON | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.04%SCHG |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 0.31% | 0.74% | 0.42%SCHG |
| PSXPHILLIPS 66 | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.20%DGRO |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.29% | 0.28% | ≈ even |
| SPGIS+P GLOBAL | 0.26% | 0.42% | 0.16%SCHG |
| KLACKLA | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.27%SCHG |
| PHPARKER HANNIFIN | 0.20% | 0.33% | 0.13%SCHG |
| TTTRANE TECHNOLOGIES | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.07%SCHG |
| TELTE CONNECTIVITY | 0.20% | 0.18% | 0.02%DGRO |
| TMOTHERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC | 0.17% | 0.73% | 0.56%SCHG |
| SHWSHERWIN-WILLIAMS | 0.16% | 0.23% | 0.08%SCHG |
| MSCI | 0.14% | 0.14% | ≈ even |
| MCOMOODYS | 0.13% | 0.22% | 0.09%SCHG |
| FANGDIAMONDBACK ENERGY | 0.18% | 0.11% | 0.08%DGRO |
| KKR | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.10%SCHG |
| GWWWW GRAINGER | 0.10% | 0.18% | 0.09%SCHG |
| HUMHUMANA | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.05%SCHG |
| MCKMCKESSON | 0.09% | 0.36% | 0.27%SCHG |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.05%SCHG |
| RMDRESMED | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.02%SCHG |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.08% | 0.16% | 0.08%SCHG |
| VSTVISTRA | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.04%SCHG |
| VMCVULCAN MATERIALS | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.05%SCHG |
| HUBBHUBBELL | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.01%SCHG |
| MLMMARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.05%SCHG |
| TXRHTexas Roadhouse Class A | 0.04% | 0.04% | ≈ even |
| HWMHOWMET AEROSPACE | 0.04% | 0.23% | 0.20%SCHG |
| LIILENNOX INTERNATIONAL | 0.03% | 0.03% | ≈ even |
| FIXCOMFORT SYSTEMS USA | 0.02% | 0.10% | 0.08%SCHG |
| CASYCASEY S GENERAL STORES | 0.02% | 0.07% | 0.06%SCHG |
| WSTWEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.06%SCHG |
| FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares /NC Class A | 0.02% | 0.06% | 0.04%SCHG |
| WWDWoodward | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.04%SCHG |
| PWRQUANTA SERVICES | 0.01% | 0.22% | 0.21%SCHG |
| EMEEMCOR GROUP | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.06%SCHG |
| CHEChemed | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01%SCHG |
| MOG.AMOOG INC-CLASS A | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.02%SCHG |
| CWCurtiss-Wright | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.04%SCHG |
| KNSLKinsale Capital Group | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02%SCHG |
| HEIHEICO | <0.01% | 0.09% | 0.09%SCHG |
1–20 of 52
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In DGRO | In SCHG |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 18.1% | 51.4% |
Healthcare | 17.8% | 7.9% |
Financial Services | 19.2% | 6.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 6.3% | 11.6% |
Industrials | 10.3% | 6.5% |
Consumer Defensive | 12.8% | 1.4% |
Communication Services | 0.1% | 12.7% |
Utilities | 7.1% | 0.4% |
Energy | 6.0% | 0.7% |
Basic Materials | 2.3% | 1.1% |
Real Estate | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
DGRO
SCHG
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.