Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) share 48 holdings, with roughly 56.4% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: QQQM October 8, 2026 · SCHG November 5, 2026.
Fund pages: QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) · SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF)
Weight overlap
56.4%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
48
Securities in both funds
Funds
QQQM · SCHG
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In QQQM | In SCHG | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 8.34% | 11.03% | 2.69%SCHG |
| AAPLAPPLE | 7.46% | 12.61% | 5.15%SCHG |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 5.82% | 9.99% | 4.17%SCHG |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM | 4.11% | 6.41% | 2.30%SCHG |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS | 3.22% | 3.89% | 0.67%SCHG |
| GOOGLALPHABET | 3.07% | 4.16% | 1.09%SCHG |
| GOOGALPHABET CL C | 2.86% | 3.36% | 0.50%SCHG |
| TSLATESLA | 2.96% | 2.82% | 0.14%QQQM |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 2.57% | 3.81% | 1.24%SCHG |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 4.85% | 2.16% | 2.69%QQQM |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.20% | 1.92% | 2.28%QQQM |
| COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE | 1.74% | 1.38% | 0.36%QQQM |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.89% | 1.04% | 0.85%QQQM |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.35% | 0.75% | 0.60%QQQM |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 1.68% | 0.74% | 0.94%QQQM |
| LINLINDE | 0.92% | 0.70% | 0.22%QQQM |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS | 1.12% | 0.64% | 0.48%QQQM |
| KLACKLA | 1.06% | 0.49% | 0.57%QQQM |
| ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL | 0.61% | 0.48% | 0.13%QQQM |
| VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS | 0.53% | 0.40% | 0.13%QQQM |
| BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS | 0.50% | 0.37% | 0.13%QQQM |
| SNDKSANDISK | 0.98% | 0.34% | 0.64%QQQM |
| STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS | 0.73% | 0.31% | 0.42%QQQM |
| APPAPPLOVIN | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.07%QQQM |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.07%QQQM |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL | 0.59% | 0.28% | 0.31%QQQM |
| MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL | 0.39% | 0.26% | 0.13%QQQM |
| REGNREGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS | 0.31% | 0.26% | 0.05%QQQM |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.40% | 0.25% | 0.15%QQQM |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.40% | 0.25% | 0.15%QQQM |
| CEGCONSTELLATION ENERGY GENERATION LL | 0.42% | 0.23% | 0.19%QQQM |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.35%QQQM |
| ABNBAIRBNB | 0.28% | 0.21% | 0.07%QQQM |
| DASHDOORDASH A | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.12%QQQM |
| DDOGDATADOG CLASS A | 0.38% | 0.17% | 0.21%QQQM |
| ADSKAUTODESK | 0.20% | 0.17% | 0.03%QQQM |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.28% | 0.16% | 0.12%QQQM |
| IDXXIDEXX LABORATORIES | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.02%QQQM |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.15% | 0.14% | 0.01%QQQM |
| BKRBAKER HUGHES HOLDINGS | 0.23% | 0.13% | 0.10%QQQM |
| LITELUMENTUM HOLDINGS | 0.39% | 0.13% | 0.26%QQQM |
| WDAYWORKDAY | 0.15% | 0.12% | 0.03%QQQM |
| TTWOTAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.05%QQQM |
| FANGDIAMONDBACK ENERGY | 0.22% | 0.11% | 0.11%QQQM |
| TERTERADYNE | 0.26% | 0.10% | 0.16%QQQM |
| AXONAXON ENTERPRISE | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.05%QQQM |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.25% | 0.08% | 0.17%QQQM |
| RKLBRocket Lab | 0.17% | 0.07% | 0.10%QQQM |
1–20 of 48
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In QQQM | In SCHG |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 60.2% | 51.4% |
Communication Services | 12.0% | 12.7% |
Consumer Cyclical | 10.2% | 11.6% |
Industrials | 5.4% | 6.5% |
Healthcare | 3.7% | 7.9% |
Consumer Defensive | 5.8% | 1.4% |
Financial Services | 0.2% | 6.0% |
Basic Materials | 0.9% | 1.1% |
Utilities | 1.1% | 0.4% |
Energy | 0.5% | 0.7% |
Real Estate | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
QQQM
SCHG
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.