ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

QQQM vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) share 47 holdings, with roughly 59.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

59.6%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

47

Securities in both funds

Funds

QQQM · SCHG

Compared side by side

Compare QQQM and SCHG live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 47 holdings QQQM and SCHG share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn QQQMIn SCHGWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA8.56%10.78%2.22%SCHG
AAPLApple7.27%9.15%1.88%SCHG
MSFTMicrosoft5.86%7.38%1.52%SCHG
AMZNAMAZON.COM4.66%5.34%0.68%SCHG
GOOGLAlphabet3.26%4.13%0.87%SCHG
AVGOBROADCOM3.20%4.03%0.83%SCHG
GOOGALPHABET CL C3.04%3.32%0.28%SCHG
METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A2.77%2.59%0.18%QQQM
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.44%2.42%1.02%QQQM
TSLATESLA2.59%2.11%0.48%QQQM
COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE1.83%1.61%0.22%QQQM
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A1.72%1.52%0.20%QQQM
NFLXNETFLIX1.36%1.20%0.16%QQQM
PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS1.29%1.13%0.16%QQQM
KLACKLA1.13%0.99%0.14%QQQM
LINLINDE0.99%0.87%0.12%QQQM
CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A0.95%0.84%0.11%QQQM
BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS0.72%0.64%0.08%QQQM
ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL0.58%0.51%0.07%QQQM
VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS0.55%0.48%0.07%QQQM
ADBEADOBE0.47%0.41%0.06%QQQM
FTNTFORTINET0.51%0.38%0.13%QQQM
APPAPPLOVIN CLASS A0.46%0.36%0.10%QQQM
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS0.41%0.36%0.05%QQQM
INTUINTUIT0.39%0.35%0.04%QQQM
CEGCONSTELLATION ENERGY0.42%0.33%0.09%QQQM
TMUST MOBILE US0.84%0.32%0.52%QQQM
DASHDOORDASH A0.39%0.31%0.08%QQQM
SNPSSYNOPSYS0.35%0.31%0.04%QQQM
DDOGDATADOG CLASS A0.34%0.30%0.04%QQQM
MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL CL A0.41%0.30%0.11%QQQM
ORLYO REILLY AUTOMOTIVE0.34%0.30%0.04%QQQM
REGNREGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS0.35%0.30%0.05%QQQM
ABNBAIRBNB CLASS A0.32%0.29%0.03%QQQM
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS0.30%0.26%0.04%QQQM
BKRBAKER HUGHES0.27%0.23%0.04%QQQM
ADSKAUTODESK0.23%0.20%0.03%QQQM
AXONAXON ENTERPRISE0.20%0.18%0.02%QQQM
IDXXIDEXX LABORATORIES0.20%0.18%0.02%QQQM
ALABAstera Labs0.25%0.17%0.08%QQQM
TTWOTAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE0.20%0.17%0.03%QQQM
RKLBRocket Lab0.21%0.16%0.05%QQQM
ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES0.18%0.16%0.02%QQQM
WDAYWORKDAY CLASS A0.16%0.14%0.02%QQQM
DXCMDEXCOM0.14%0.13%0.01%QQQM
MSTRMicroStrategy Class A0.14%0.13%0.01%QQQM
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals0.13%0.11%0.02%QQQM

1–20 of 47

Sector exposure: QQQM vs SCHG

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn QQQMIn SCHG
Technology
59.1%46.9%
Communication Services
12.8%13.2%
Consumer Cyclical
11.0%10.8%
Healthcare
3.8%9.5%
Industrials
4.1%6.8%
Consumer Defensive
6.3%1.8%
Financial Services
0.2%7.7%
Basic Materials
1.0%1.5%
Utilities
1.1%0.4%
Energy
0.5%0.8%
Real Estate
0.0%0.5%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in QQQM and SCHG

QQQM

SCHG


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.