iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) share 10 holdings, with roughly 0.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
0.6%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
10
Securities in both funds
Funds
IEFA · QQQM
Compared side by side
IEFA holds other funds. Weight overlap looks through to what those hold — 3 funds, covering 100% of IEFA's weight.
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In IEFA | In QQQM | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NBISNEBIUS GROUP NV | 0.18% | 0.24% | 0.06%QQQM |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 1.16% | 0.18% | 0.98%IEFA |
| FERFERROVIAL NV | 0.11% | 0.18% | 0.07%QQQM |
| CCEPCOCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS | 0.08% | 0.21% | 0.13%QQQM |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 0.02% | 0.47% | 0.45%QQQM |
| TRIThomson Reuters | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.16%QQQM |
| AEPAMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.30%QQQM |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.22%QQQM |
| LINLINDE | 0.00% | 0.95% | 0.95%QQQM |
| WBDWARNER BROS DISCOVERY | 0.00% | 0.31% | 0.31%QQQM |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In IEFA | In QQQM |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 13.3% | 59.5% |
Financial Services | 24.3% | 0.2% |
Industrials | 19.0% | 4.1% |
Consumer Cyclical | 8.1% | 10.8% |
Communication Services | 4.0% | 12.8% |
Consumer Defensive | 5.8% | 6.1% |
Healthcare | 7.6% | 3.8% |
Basic Materials | 6.8% | 1.0% |
Energy | 5.1% | 0.5% |
Utilities | 3.7% | 1.2% |
Real Estate | 2.4% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
IEFA
QQQM
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.