JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® High Dividend ETF (SPYD) share 12 holdings, with roughly 6.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
6.6%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
12
Securities in both funds
Funds
JEPI · SPYD
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In JEPI | In SPYD | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEPPEPSICO | 1.19% | 1.26% | 0.07%SPYD |
| EOGEOG RESOURCES | 1.46% | 1.17% | 0.29%JEPI |
| BMYBRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB | 1.03% | 1.31% | 0.28%SPYD |
| ACNACCENTURE CL A | 0.61% | 1.51% | 0.90%SPYD |
| TAT+T | 0.60% | 1.27% | 0.67%SPYD |
| MDTMEDTRONIC | 0.51% | 1.30% | 0.79%SPYD |
| VZVerizon Communications | 0.39% | 1.31% | 0.92%SPYD |
| USBUS BANCORP | 0.32% | 1.22% | 0.90%SPYD |
| AMTAMERICAN TOWER | 0.28% | 1.27% | 0.99%SPYD |
| KMBKIMBERLY CLARK | 0.23% | 1.23% | 1.00%SPYD |
| MOALTRIA GROUP | 0.22% | 1.16% | 0.94%SPYD |
| BBYBEST BUY | 0.09% | 1.14% | 1.05%SPYD |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In JEPI | In SPYD |
|---|---|---|
Real Estate | 2.5% | 24.5% |
Technology | 19.5% | 6.9% |
Consumer Defensive | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Financial Services | 10.7% | 12.7% |
Consumer Cyclical | 12.4% | 8.8% |
Industrials | 14.5% | 3.8% |
Healthcare | 14.2% | 3.9% |
Utilities | 5.2% | 10.6% |
Communication Services | 7.3% | 5.2% |
Energy | 2.8% | 4.8% |
Basic Materials | 1.8% | 3.7% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
JEPI
SPYD
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.