ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

IEMG vs JEPI: Holdings Overlap

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) share 3 holdings, with roughly 0% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

0%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

3

Securities in both funds

Funds

IEMG · JEPI

Compared side by side

Compare IEMG and JEPI live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 3 holdings IEMG and JEPI share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn IEMGIn JEPIWeight gap
ECLECOLAB0.01%1.20%1.19%JEPI
SRESEMPRA0.01%0.99%0.98%JEPI
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS0.00%0.42%0.42%JEPI

Sector exposure: IEMG vs JEPI

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn IEMGIn JEPI
Technology
38.8%19.5%
Financial Services
18.5%10.7%
Consumer Cyclical
9.3%12.4%
Industrials
7.1%14.5%
Healthcare
3.7%14.2%
Communication Services
6.1%7.3%
Consumer Defensive
3.0%9.0%
Basic Materials
6.3%1.8%
Utilities
1.9%5.2%
Energy
3.7%2.8%
Real Estate
1.5%2.5%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in IEMG and JEPI

IEMG

JEPI


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.