JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) share 9 holdings, with roughly 7.2% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: JEPI October 30, 2026 · SOXX November 5, 2026.
Fund pages: JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) · SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF)
Weight overlap
7.2%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
9
Securities in both funds
Funds
JEPI · SOXX
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In JEPI | In SOXX | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 1.69% | 8.50% | 6.81%SOXX |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 1.62% | 8.14% | 6.52%SOXX |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.21% | 3.17% | 1.96%SOXX |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 0.95% | 7.08% | 6.13%SOXX |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 0.93% | 8.88% | 7.95%SOXX |
| INTCINTEL | 0.26% | 6.03% | 5.77%SOXX |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS | 0.26% | 5.51% | 5.25%SOXX |
| NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 0.22% | 4.27% | 4.05%SOXX |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 0.09% | 3.60% | 3.51%SOXX |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In JEPI | In SOXX |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 18.1% | 100.0% |
Healthcare | 14.2% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 14.2% | 0.0% |
Financial Services | 11.8% | 0.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 10.6% | 0.0% |
Consumer Defensive | 10.3% | 0.0% |
Communication Services | 7.3% | 0.0% |
Utilities | 5.8% | 0.0% |
Energy | 3.9% | 0.0% |
Real Estate | 2.2% | 0.0% |
Basic Materials | 1.6% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
JEPI
SOXX
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.