ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

JEPI vs SMH: Holdings Overlap

JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 9 holdings, with roughly 8.4% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

8.4%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

9

Securities in both funds

Funds

JEPI · SMH

Compared side by side

Compare JEPI and SMH live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 9 holdings JEPI and SMH share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn JEPIIn SMHWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA1.86%22.03%20.17%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM1.74%6.74%5.00%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH1.30%4.31%3.01%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES0.97%5.45%4.48%SMH
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS0.81%2.22%1.41%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES0.64%4.36%3.72%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS0.52%4.48%3.96%SMH
NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV0.42%1.08%0.66%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY0.18%4.98%4.80%SMH

Sector exposure: JEPI vs SMH

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn JEPIIn SMH
Technology
19.5%100.0%
Industrials
14.5%0.0%
Healthcare
14.2%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
12.4%0.0%
Financial Services
10.7%0.0%
Consumer Defensive
9.0%0.0%
Communication Services
7.3%0.0%
Utilities
5.2%0.0%
Energy
2.8%0.0%
Real Estate
2.5%0.0%
Basic Materials
1.8%0.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in JEPI and SMH

JEPI

SMH


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.