ETF overlap · Updated September 27, 2026

SMH vs VTI: Holdings Overlap

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) share 19 holdings, with roughly 15.2% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

15.2%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

19

Securities in both funds

Funds

SMH · VTI

Compared side by side

Compare SMH and VTI live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 19 holdings SMH and VTI share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn SMHIn VTIWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA19.28%6.87%12.41%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM5.25%2.37%2.88%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY5.05%1.46%3.59%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES5.80%1.04%4.76%SMH
INTCINTEL5.17%0.51%4.66%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH4.19%0.51%3.68%SMH
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS4.36%0.49%3.87%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS4.46%0.32%4.14%SMH
KLACKLA4.41%0.31%4.10%SMH
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY4.44%0.26%4.18%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES3.96%0.24%3.72%SMH
QCOMQUALCOMM3.98%0.24%3.74%SMH
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS1.89%0.13%1.76%SMH
SNPSSYNOPSYS1.76%0.11%1.65%SMH
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS1.19%0.08%1.11%SMH
TERTERADYNE1.23%0.07%1.16%SMH
ALABAstera Labs1.15%0.06%1.09%SMH
MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY0.76%0.05%0.71%SMH
ONON SEMICONDUCTOR0.46%0.04%0.42%SMH

Sector exposure: SMH vs VTI

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn SMHIn VTI
Technology
100.0%36.7%
Financial Services
0.0%12.3%
Healthcare
0.0%9.8%
Consumer Cyclical
0.0%9.2%
Industrials
0.0%9.1%
Communication Services
0.0%8.8%
Consumer Defensive
0.0%4.3%
Energy
0.0%3.7%
Real Estate
0.0%2.2%
Utilities
0.0%2.0%
Basic Materials
0.0%1.9%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in SMH and VTI

SMH

VTI


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of September 27, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.