Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF (XSD) share 9 holdings, with roughly 9.5% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: SCHG November 5, 2026 · XSD November 2, 2026.
Fund pages: SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) · XSD (State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF)
Weight overlap
9.5%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
9
Securities in both funds
Funds
SCHG · XSD
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In SCHG | In XSD | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 11.03% | 2.57% | 8.46%SCHG |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 3.81% | 2.52% | 1.29%SCHG |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 2.16% | 2.31% | 0.15%XSD |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 1.92% | 2.55% | 0.63%XSD |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.16% | 2.94% | 2.78%XSD |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.08% | 2.18% | 2.10%XSD |
| CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 0.06% | 2.38% | 2.32%XSD |
| MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings | 0.04% | 2.21% | 2.17%XSD |
| SITMSiTime | 0.02% | 2.02% | 1.99%XSD |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In SCHG | In XSD |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 51.4% | 99.5% |
Communication Services | 12.7% | 0.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 11.6% | 0.0% |
Healthcare | 7.9% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 6.5% | 0.5% |
Financial Services | 6.0% | 0.0% |
Consumer Defensive | 1.4% | 0.0% |
Basic Materials | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Energy | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Utilities | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Real Estate | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
SCHG
XSD
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.