Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) share 39 holdings, with roughly 54.8% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
54.8%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
39
Securities in both funds
Funds
QQQM · VGT
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In QQQM | In VGT | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 8.56% | 16.10% | 7.54%VGT |
| AAPLApple | 7.27% | 14.33% | 7.06%VGT |
| MSFTMicrosoft | 5.86% | 8.28% | 2.42%VGT |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 4.31% | 5.04% | 0.73%VGT |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.44% | 3.65% | 0.21%VGT |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 3.20% | 3.84% | 0.64%VGT |
| INTCINTEL | 2.23% | 2.41% | 0.18%VGT |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 1.87% | 2.26% | 0.39%VGT |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS | 2.09% | 1.82% | 0.27%QQQM |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.70% | 2.14% | 0.44%VGT |
| KLACKLA | 1.13% | 1.59% | 0.46%VGT |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.29% | 1.12% | 0.17%QQQM |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.05%QQQM |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.72% | 1.01% | 0.71%QQQM |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 0.83% | 1.05% | 0.22%VGT |
| ADIANALOG DEVICES | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.04%QQQM |
| STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS | 0.79% | 0.87% | 0.08%VGT |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A | 0.95% | 0.78% | 0.17%QQQM |
| SNDKSANDISK | 0.78% | 1.33% | 0.55%VGT |
| QCOMQUALCOMM | 0.77% | 0.80% | 0.03%VGT |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.26%VGT |
| APPAPPLOVIN CLASS A | 0.46% | 0.49% | 0.03%VGT |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.08%QQQM |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.04%VGT |
| ADBEADOBE | 0.47% | 0.35% | 0.12%QQQM |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.35% | 0.35% | ≈ even |
| DDOGDATADOG CLASS A | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.03%VGT |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.10%QQQM |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.30% | 0.29% | 0.01%QQQM |
| LITELUMENTUM HOLDINGS | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.02%QQQM |
| NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.06%VGT |
| TERTERADYNE | 0.26% | 0.36% | 0.10%VGT |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.25% | 0.34% | 0.09%VGT |
| MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.03%VGT |
| ADSKAUTODESK | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.04%QQQM |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.18% | 0.18% | ≈ even |
| WDAYWORKDAY CLASS A | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.03%QQQM |
| MSTRMicroStrategy Class A | 0.14% | 0.10% | 0.04%QQQM |
| CRWVCoreWeave Class A | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.18%QQQM |
1–20 of 39
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In QQQM | In VGT |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 59.1% | 98.7% |
Communication Services | 12.8% | 0.5% |
Consumer Cyclical | 11.0% | 0.1% |
Consumer Defensive | 6.3% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 4.1% | 0.3% |
Healthcare | 3.8% | 0.0% |
Utilities | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Basic Materials | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Financial Services | 0.2% | 0.4% |
Energy | 0.5% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
QQQM
VGT
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.