ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

QQQM vs SMH: Holdings Overlap

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 20 holdings, with roughly 32.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

32.6%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

20

Securities in both funds

Funds

QQQM · SMH

Compared side by side

Compare QQQM and SMH live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 20 holdings QQQM and SMH share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn QQQMIn SMHWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA8.56%22.03%13.47%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY4.31%4.98%0.67%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.44%5.45%2.01%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM3.20%6.74%3.54%SMH
INTCINTEL2.23%4.23%2.00%SMH
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS1.87%4.82%2.95%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH1.70%4.31%2.61%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS1.14%4.48%3.34%SMH
KLACKLA1.13%4.10%2.97%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES0.83%4.36%3.53%SMH
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY0.83%3.78%2.95%SMH
QCOMQUALCOMM0.77%3.73%2.96%SMH
ARMARM Holdings0.52%1.08%0.56%SMH
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS0.41%2.22%1.81%SMH
SNPSSYNOPSYS0.35%1.88%1.53%SMH
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS0.30%1.38%1.08%SMH
NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV0.26%1.08%0.82%SMH
TERTERADYNE0.26%1.37%1.11%SMH
ALABAstera Labs0.25%1.00%0.75%SMH
MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY0.20%0.84%0.64%SMH

Sector exposure: QQQM vs SMH

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn QQQMIn SMH
Technology
59.1%100.0%
Communication Services
12.8%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
11.0%0.0%
Consumer Defensive
6.3%0.0%
Industrials
4.1%0.0%
Healthcare
3.8%0.0%
Utilities
1.1%0.0%
Basic Materials
1.0%0.0%
Energy
0.5%0.0%
Financial Services
0.2%0.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in QQQM and SMH

QQQM

SMH


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.