ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

QQQ vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) share 47 holdings, with roughly 59.6% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

59.6%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

47

Securities in both funds

Funds

QQQ · SCHG

Compared side by side

Compare QQQ and SCHG live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 47 holdings QQQ and SCHG share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn QQQIn SCHGWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA8.56%10.78%2.22%SCHG
AAPLApple7.27%9.15%1.88%SCHG
MSFTMicrosoft5.87%7.38%1.51%SCHG
AMZNAMAZON.COM4.66%5.34%0.68%SCHG
GOOGLAlphabet3.26%4.13%0.87%SCHG
AVGOBROADCOM3.20%4.03%0.83%SCHG
GOOGALPHABET CL C3.05%3.32%0.27%SCHG
METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A2.77%2.59%0.18%QQQ
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.44%2.42%1.02%QQQ
TSLATESLA2.59%2.11%0.48%QQQ
COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE1.83%1.61%0.22%QQQ
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A1.72%1.52%0.20%QQQ
NFLXNETFLIX1.36%1.20%0.16%QQQ
PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS1.29%1.13%0.16%QQQ
KLACKLA1.13%0.99%0.14%QQQ
LINLINDE0.99%0.87%0.12%QQQ
CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A0.95%0.84%0.11%QQQ
BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS0.72%0.64%0.08%QQQ
ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL0.58%0.51%0.07%QQQ
VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS0.55%0.48%0.07%QQQ
ADBEADOBE0.47%0.41%0.06%QQQ
FTNTFORTINET0.51%0.38%0.13%QQQ
APPAPPLOVIN CLASS A0.46%0.36%0.10%QQQ
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS0.41%0.36%0.05%QQQ
INTUINTUIT0.39%0.35%0.04%QQQ
CEGCONSTELLATION ENERGY0.43%0.33%0.10%QQQ
TMUST MOBILE US0.84%0.32%0.52%QQQ
DASHDOORDASH A0.39%0.31%0.08%QQQ
SNPSSYNOPSYS0.35%0.31%0.04%QQQ
DDOGDATADOG CLASS A0.34%0.30%0.04%QQQ
MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL CL A0.41%0.30%0.11%QQQ
ORLYO REILLY AUTOMOTIVE0.34%0.30%0.04%QQQ
REGNREGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS0.35%0.30%0.05%QQQ
ABNBAIRBNB CLASS A0.32%0.29%0.03%QQQ
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS0.30%0.26%0.04%QQQ
BKRBAKER HUGHES0.27%0.23%0.04%QQQ
ADSKAUTODESK0.23%0.20%0.03%QQQ
AXONAXON ENTERPRISE0.20%0.18%0.02%QQQ
IDXXIDEXX LABORATORIES0.20%0.18%0.02%QQQ
ALABAstera Labs0.25%0.17%0.08%QQQ
TTWOTAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE0.20%0.17%0.03%QQQ
RKLBRocket Lab0.21%0.16%0.05%QQQ
ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES0.18%0.16%0.02%QQQ
WDAYWORKDAY CLASS A0.16%0.14%0.02%QQQ
DXCMDEXCOM0.14%0.13%0.01%QQQ
MSTRMicroStrategy Class A0.14%0.13%0.01%QQQ
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals0.13%0.11%0.02%QQQ

1–20 of 47

Sector exposure: QQQ vs SCHG

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn QQQIn SCHG
Technology
59.1%46.9%
Communication Services
12.8%13.2%
Consumer Cyclical
11.0%10.8%
Healthcare
3.8%9.5%
Industrials
4.1%6.8%
Consumer Defensive
6.3%1.8%
Financial Services
0.2%7.7%
Basic Materials
1.0%1.5%
Utilities
1.1%0.4%
Energy
0.5%0.8%
Real Estate
0.0%0.5%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in QQQ and SCHG

QQQ

SCHG


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.