Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) share 35 holdings, with roughly 62.7% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: MGK September 30, 2026 · QQQM October 8, 2026.
Fund pages: MGK (Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF) · QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF)
Weight overlap
62.7%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
35
Securities in both funds
Funds
MGK · QQQM
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In MGK | In QQQM | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 13.69% | 8.34% | 5.35%MGK |
| AAPLAPPLE | 12.53% | 7.46% | 5.07%MGK |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 9.46% | 5.82% | 3.64%MGK |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM | 4.23% | 4.11% | 0.12%MGK |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.22% | 4.20% | 0.98%QQQM |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS | 4.96% | 3.22% | 1.74%MGK |
| GOOGLALPHABET | 4.98% | 3.07% | 1.91%MGK |
| TSLATESLA | 3.14% | 2.96% | 0.18%MGK |
| GOOGALPHABET CL C | 3.95% | 2.86% | 1.09%MGK |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 4.30% | 2.57% | 1.73%MGK |
| INTCINTEL | 1.87% | 2.33% | 0.46%QQQM |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.21%QQQM |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 1.45% | 1.68% | 0.23%QQQM |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.45% | 1.89% | 0.44%QQQM |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.22% | 1.35% | 0.13%QQQM |
| NFLXNETFLIX | 1.05% | 1.23% | 0.18%QQQM |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS | 1.04% | 1.12% | 0.08%QQQM |
| KLACKLA | 0.99% | 1.06% | 0.07%QQQM |
| SNDKSANDISK | 0.98% | 0.98% | ≈ even |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 0.95% | 1.00% | 0.05%QQQM |
| STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.13%MGK |
| ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.06%MGK |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL | 0.68% | 0.59% | 0.09%MGK |
| VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS | 0.61% | 0.53% | 0.08%MGK |
| BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.05%MGK |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Class A | 0.49% | 2.85% | 2.36%QQQM |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.42% | 0.57% | 0.15%QQQM |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.52% | 0.40% | 0.12%MGK |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.10%MGK |
| MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.04%QQQM |
| APPAPPLOVIN | 0.45% | 0.35% | 0.10%MGK |
| MNSTMONSTER BEVERAGE | 0.38% | 0.35% | 0.03%MGK |
| CTASCINTAS NO 2 | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.01%QQQM |
| ORLYOREILLY AUTOMOTIVE | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.13%MGK |
| ABNBAIRBNB | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.12%MGK |
1–20 of 35
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In MGK | In QQQM |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 62.0% | 60.2% |
Communication Services | 15.5% | 12.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 9.6% | 10.2% |
Healthcare | 4.4% | 3.7% |
Industrials | 2.4% | 5.4% |
Consumer Defensive | 0.4% | 5.8% |
Financial Services | 4.1% | 0.2% |
Basic Materials | 0.4% | 0.9% |
Real Estate | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Utilities | 0.0% | 1.1% |
Energy | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
MGK
QQQM
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.