Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) share 36 holdings, with roughly 59.8% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
59.8%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
36
Securities in both funds
Funds
MGK · QQQM
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In MGK | In QQQM | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 13.54% | 8.56% | 4.98%MGK |
| AAPLApple | 13.21% | 7.27% | 5.94%MGK |
| MSFTMicrosoft | 9.51% | 5.86% | 3.65%MGK |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM | 5.17% | 4.66% | 0.51%MGK |
| GOOGLAlphabet | 6.00% | 3.26% | 2.74%MGK |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 4.48% | 3.20% | 1.28%MGK |
| GOOGALPHABET CL C | 4.79% | 3.04% | 1.75%MGK |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 4.10% | 2.77% | 1.33%MGK |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 2.66% | 3.44% | 0.78%QQQM |
| TSLATESLA | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.36%MGK |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.32% | 1.70% | 0.38%QQQM |
| NFLXNETFLIX | 1.14% | 1.36% | 0.22%QQQM |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.09% | 1.29% | 0.20%QQQM |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.04% | 1.72% | 0.68%QQQM |
| KLACKLA | 0.91% | 1.13% | 0.22%QQQM |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 0.81% | 1.87% | 1.06%QQQM |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A | 0.80% | 0.95% | 0.15%QQQM |
| INTCINTEL | 0.72% | 2.23% | 1.51%QQQM |
| BKNGBOOKING HOLDINGS | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.03%QQQM |
| SNDKSANDISK | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.09%QQQM |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.17%QQQM |
| ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL | 0.57% | 0.58% | 0.01%QQQM |
| VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.03%MGK |
| APPAPPLOVIN CLASS A | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.05%MGK |
| STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS | 0.46% | 0.79% | 0.33%QQQM |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL | 0.45% | 0.65% | 0.20%QQQM |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.47% | 0.41% | 0.06%MGK |
| MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL CL A | 0.43% | 0.41% | 0.02%MGK |
| MNSTMONSTER BEVERAGE | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.02%MGK |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.37% | 0.51% | 0.14%QQQM |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.03%QQQM |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.40% | 0.35% | 0.05%MGK |
| CTASCINTAS | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.01%QQQM |
| ORLYO REILLY AUTOMOTIVE | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.09%MGK |
| ABNBAIRBNB CLASS A | 0.40% | 0.32% | 0.08%MGK |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Class A | 0.31% | 1.11% | 0.80%QQQM |
1–20 of 36
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In MGK | In QQQM |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 58.6% | 59.1% |
Communication Services | 16.6% | 12.8% |
Consumer Cyclical | 11.1% | 11.0% |
Healthcare | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Consumer Defensive | 0.4% | 6.3% |
Industrials | 2.4% | 4.1% |
Financial Services | 4.4% | 0.2% |
Basic Materials | 0.4% | 1.0% |
Real Estate | 1.3% | 0.0% |
Utilities | 0.0% | 1.1% |
Energy | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
MGK
QQQM
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.