JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF (XSD) share 11 holdings, with roughly 14.9% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
14.9%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
11
Securities in both funds
Funds
JEPQ · XSD
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In JEPQ | In XSD | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.00% | 2.59% | 1.41%JEPQ |
| NVDANVIDIA | 7.37% | 2.40% | 4.97%JEPQ |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 5.11% | 2.39% | 2.72%JEPQ |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 2.01% | 2.37% | 0.36%XSD |
| INTCINTEL | 1.40% | 2.47% | 1.07%XSD |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 1.18% | 2.51% | 1.33%XSD |
| ADIANALOG DEVICES | 1.06% | 2.48% | 1.42%XSD |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS | 0.75% | 2.46% | 1.71%XSD |
| QCOMQUALCOMM | 0.62% | 2.43% | 1.81%XSD |
| NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 0.45% | 2.46% | 2.01%XSD |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.06% | 2.44% | 2.38%XSD |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In JEPQ | In XSD |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 60.8% | 99.3% |
Communication Services | 12.8% | 0.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 10.7% | 0.0% |
Consumer Defensive | 5.4% | 0.0% |
Healthcare | 4.2% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 3.5% | 0.7% |
Utilities | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Basic Materials | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Financial Services | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Energy | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Real Estate | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
JEPQ
XSD
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.