ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

JEPQ vs SMH: Holdings Overlap

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 18 holdings, with roughly 27.4% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

27.4%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

18

Securities in both funds

Funds

JEPQ · SMH

Compared side by side

Compare JEPQ and SMH live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 18 holdings JEPQ and SMH share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn JEPQIn SMHWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA7.21%22.03%14.82%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY4.17%4.98%0.81%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.13%5.45%2.32%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM2.36%6.74%4.38%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH2.07%4.31%2.24%SMH
INTCINTEL1.13%4.23%3.10%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES1.08%4.36%3.28%SMH
ASMLASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS1.01%4.95%3.94%SMH
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY0.98%3.78%2.80%SMH
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS0.96%4.82%3.86%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS0.80%4.48%3.68%SMH
TERTERADYNE0.59%1.37%0.78%SMH
QCOMQUALCOMM0.52%3.73%3.21%SMH
NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV0.46%1.08%0.62%SMH
SNPSSYNOPSYS0.46%1.88%1.42%SMH
ARMARM Holdings0.28%1.08%0.80%SMH
KLACKLA0.15%4.10%3.95%SMH
ALABAstera Labs0.06%1.00%0.94%SMH

Sector exposure: JEPQ vs SMH

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn JEPQIn SMH
Technology
58.9%100.0%
Communication Services
12.8%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
11.6%0.0%
Consumer Defensive
5.9%0.0%
Healthcare
4.4%0.0%
Industrials
3.5%0.0%
Utilities
1.0%0.0%
Basic Materials
0.8%0.0%
Financial Services
0.4%0.0%
Energy
0.4%0.0%
Real Estate
0.2%0.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in JEPQ and SMH

JEPQ

SMH


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.