iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) share 54 holdings, with roughly 56.1% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
56.1%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
54
Securities in both funds
Funds
IYW · SCHG
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In IYW | In SCHG | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 14.11% | 11.04% | 3.07%IYW |
| AAPLApple | 13.21% | 9.38% | 3.83%IYW |
| MSFTMicrosoft | 10.76% | 7.41% | 3.35%IYW |
| GOOGLAlphabet | 5.48% | 4.01% | 1.47%IYW |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 4.07% | 3.53% | 0.54%IYW |
| GOOGALPHABET CL C | 4.44% | 3.20% | 1.24%IYW |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 4.17% | 2.72% | 1.45%IYW |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.08% | 2.58% | 0.50%IYW |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.83% | 1.53% | 0.30%IYW |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.35% | 1.07% | 0.28%IYW |
| KLACKLA | 1.15% | 0.96% | 0.19%IYW |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A | 1.04% | 0.83% | 0.21%IYW |
| CRMSALESFORCE | 0.96% | 0.79% | 0.17%IYW |
| NOWSERVICENOW | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.13%IYW |
| SNOWSnowflake | 0.55% | 0.45% | 0.10%IYW |
| VRTVERTIV HOLDINGS A | 0.47% | 0.44% | 0.03%IYW |
| ADBEADOBE | 0.50% | 0.41% | 0.09%IYW |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.48% | 0.38% | 0.10%IYW |
| NETCloudflare Class A | 0.49% | 0.35% | 0.14%IYW |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.08%IYW |
| APPAPPLOVIN CLASS A | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.04%IYW |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.08%IYW |
| DASHDOORDASH A | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.07%IYW |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.37% | 0.29% | 0.08%IYW |
| DDOGDATADOG CLASS A | 0.36% | 0.27% | 0.09%IYW |
| COHRCOHERENT | 0.26% | 0.23% | 0.03%IYW |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.28% | 0.23% | 0.05%IYW |
| MSTRMicroStrategy Class A | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.03%IYW |
| ADSKAUTODESK | 0.22% | 0.17% | 0.05%IYW |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.20% | 0.16% | 0.04%IYW |
| ALABAstera Labs | 0.22% | 0.15% | 0.07%IYW |
| WDAYWORKDAY CLASS A | 0.19% | 0.15% | 0.04%IYW |
| CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 0.13% | 0.11% | 0.02%IYW |
| MDBMongoDB Class A | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.03%IYW |
| OKTAOkta | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.03%IYW |
| ZMZoom Video Communications Inc - Class A | 0.13% | 0.10% | 0.03%IYW |
| SMCISUPER MICRO COMPUTER | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.01%IYW |
| RDDTReddit Class A | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.02%IYW |
| ZSZscaler | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.01%IYW |
| DTDynatrace | 0.08% | 0.06% | 0.02%IYW |
| PTC | 0.08% | 0.06% | 0.02%IYW |
| RBRKRubrik Class A | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.01%IYW |
| TOSTToast Class A | 0.08% | 0.06% | 0.02%IYW |
| TYLTYLER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.01%IYW |
| CACICACI International Class A | 0.07% | 0.05% | 0.02%IYW |
| DOCUDocusign Class A | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.01%IYW |
| GDDYGODADDY CLASS A | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.01%IYW |
| HUBSHubSpot | 0.05% | 0.05% | ≈ even |
| PAYCPaycom Software | 0.04% | 0.04% | ≈ even |
| PINSPinterest Class A | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.01%IYW |
| ESTCElastic NV | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.01%IYW |
| PCORProcore Technologies | 0.03% | 0.03% | ≈ even |
| MBGLMOBILITY GLOBAL | 0.02% | 0.02% | ≈ even |
| OLEDUniversal Display | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01%IYW |
1–20 of 54
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In IYW | In SCHG |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 84.1% | 47.1% |
Communication Services | 14.7% | 13.1% |
Consumer Cyclical | 0.4% | 10.6% |
Healthcare | 0.0% | 9.7% |
Financial Services | 0.2% | 8.0% |
Industrials | 0.6% | 6.4% |
Consumer Defensive | 0.0% | 1.7% |
Basic Materials | 0.0% | 1.4% |
Energy | 0.0% | 1.0% |
Real Estate | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Utilities | 0.0% | 0.5% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
IYW
SCHG
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.