ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

IVV vs SMH: Holdings Overlap

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 20 holdings, with roughly 18% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

18%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

20

Securities in both funds

Funds

IVV · SMH

Compared side by side

Compare IVV and SMH live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 20 holdings IVV and SMH share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn IVVIn SMHWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA8.12%22.03%13.91%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM3.03%6.74%3.71%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY1.48%4.98%3.50%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES1.18%5.45%4.27%SMH
INTCINTEL0.72%4.23%3.51%SMH
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS0.64%4.82%4.18%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH0.58%4.31%3.73%SMH
KLACKLA0.39%4.10%3.71%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS0.39%4.48%4.09%SMH
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY0.29%3.78%3.49%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES0.28%4.36%4.08%SMH
QCOMQUALCOMM0.26%3.73%3.47%SMH
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS0.14%2.22%2.08%SMH
SNPSSYNOPSYS0.12%1.88%1.76%SMH
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS0.10%1.38%1.28%SMH
NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV0.09%1.08%0.99%SMH
TERTERADYNE0.09%1.37%1.28%SMH
MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY0.07%0.84%0.77%SMH
ONON SEMICONDUCTOR0.05%0.55%0.50%SMH
SWKSSKYWORKS SOLUTIONS0.02%0.18%0.16%SMH

Sector exposure: IVV vs SMH

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn IVVIn SMH
Technology
38.7%100.0%
Financial Services
12.0%0.0%
Communication Services
9.6%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
9.5%0.0%
Healthcare
9.0%0.0%
Industrials
8.1%0.0%
Consumer Defensive
4.5%0.0%
Energy
3.1%0.0%
Utilities
2.1%0.0%
Real Estate
1.8%0.0%
Basic Materials
1.7%0.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in IVV and SMH

IVV

SMH


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.