ETF overlap · Updated August 15, 2026

IEMG vs SCHX: Holdings Overlap

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) share 18 holdings, with roughly 0.1% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Weight overlap

0.1%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

18

Securities in both funds

Funds

IEMG · SCHX

Compared side by side

Compare IEMG and SCHX live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 18 holdings IEMG and SCHX share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn IEMGIn SCHXWeight gap
HALHALLIBURTON0.07%0.04%0.03%IEMG
BDXBECTON DICKINSON0.02%0.07%0.05%SCHX
CCLCARNIVAL LTD0.01%0.05%0.04%SCHX
ECLECOLAB0.01%0.10%0.09%SCHX
IEXIDEX0.01%0.02%0.01%SCHX
LULULULULEMON ATHLETICA0.01%0.02%0.01%SCHX
MOHMolina Healthcare0.03%0.01%0.02%IEMG
SRESEMPRA0.01%0.08%0.07%SCHX
TELTE CONNECTIVITY0.01%0.09%0.08%SCHX
TRUTransUnion0.01%0.02%0.01%SCHX
ACIAlbertsons Class A0.00%0.01%0.01%SCHX
CNHCNH Industrial NV0.00%0.01%0.01%SCHX
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS0.00%0.20%0.20%SCHX
EGPEastGroup Properties0.00%0.02%0.02%SCHX
POOLPool0.00%0.01%0.01%SCHX
PPCPilgrim's Pride0.04%0.00%0.04%IEMG
PTC0.00%0.02%0.02%SCHX
SCIService International/US0.00%0.02%0.02%SCHX

Sector exposure: IEMG vs SCHX

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn IEMGIn SCHX
Technology
38.8%37.5%
Financial Services
18.5%12.1%
Consumer Cyclical
9.3%9.4%
Industrials
7.1%9.1%
Communication Services
6.1%9.4%
Healthcare
3.7%9.1%
Basic Materials
6.3%1.7%
Consumer Defensive
3.0%4.4%
Energy
3.7%3.3%
Utilities
1.9%2.0%
Real Estate
1.5%2.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in IEMG and SCHX

IEMG

SCHX


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Data reflects the latest holdings we have for each fund as of August 15, 2026. Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.