ETF & mutual fund overlap · Page updated November 8, 2026

SMH vs XLK: Holdings Overlap

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK) share 19 holdings, with roughly 43.4% of their portfolio weight overlapping.

Holdings as of: SMH November 5, 2026 · XLK November 3, 2026.

Fund pages: SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) · XLK (State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF)

Weight overlap

43.4%

Shared portfolio weight

Shared holdings

19

Securities in both funds

Funds

SMH · XLK

Compared side by side

Compare SMH and XLK live →

Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.

All 19 holdings SMH and XLK share

Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.

HoldingIn SMHIn XLKWeight gap
NVDANVIDIA21.00%15.47%5.53%SMH
AVGOBROADCOM5.88%4.89%0.99%SMH
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES5.02%4.42%0.60%SMH
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY4.13%3.96%0.17%SMH
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS3.95%1.90%2.05%SMH
INTCINTEL2.86%1.88%0.98%SMH
LRCXLAM RESEARCH3.40%1.81%1.59%SMH
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS6.17%1.79%4.38%SMH
ADIANALOG DEVICES5.03%1.28%3.75%SMH
KLACKLA4.12%1.28%2.84%SMH
QCOMQUALCOMM4.32%1.10%3.22%SMH
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY3.08%0.94%2.14%SMH
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS2.46%0.56%1.90%SMH
SNPSSYNOPSYS2.45%0.56%1.89%SMH
NXPINXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV1.42%0.42%1.00%SMH
MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS1.36%0.41%0.95%SMH
MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY0.89%0.26%0.63%SMH
TERTERADYNE0.91%0.26%0.65%SMH
ONON SEMICONDUCTOR0.53%0.18%0.35%SMH

Sector exposure: SMH vs XLK

How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.

SectorIn SMHIn XLK
Technology
100.0%100.0%

Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.

All holdings in SMH and XLK

SMH

XLK


What does ETF overlap mean?

Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.

Related comparisons

Computed on November 8, 2026 from the latest holdings each fund has published (dated at the top of the page). Holdings change over time. For information only — not investment advice.