Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) share 10 holdings, with roughly 28.9% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Holdings as of: MGK September 30, 2026 · SMH November 5, 2026.
Fund pages: MGK (Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF) · SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
Weight overlap
28.9%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
10
Securities in both funds
Funds
MGK · SMH
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In MGK | In SMH | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 13.69% | 21.00% | 7.31%SMH |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 4.30% | 5.88% | 1.58%SMH |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.22% | 5.02% | 1.80%SMH |
| INTCINTEL | 1.87% | 2.86% | 0.99%SMH |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.45% | 3.40% | 1.95%SMH |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 1.45% | 3.95% | 2.50%SMH |
| KLACKLA | 0.99% | 4.12% | 3.13%SMH |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 0.95% | 3.08% | 2.13%SMH |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.52% | 2.46% | 1.94%SMH |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.50% | 2.45% | 1.95%SMH |
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In MGK | In SMH |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 62.0% | 100.0% |
Communication Services | 15.5% | 0.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 9.6% | 0.0% |
Healthcare | 4.4% | 0.0% |
Financial Services | 4.1% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 2.4% | 0.0% |
Real Estate | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Basic Materials | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Consumer Defensive | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
MGK
SMH
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.