iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK) share 58 holdings, with roughly 76.9% of their portfolio weight overlapping.
Weight overlap
76.9%
Shared portfolio weight
Shared holdings
58
Securities in both funds
Funds
IYW · XLK
Compared side by side
Interactive charts, sector exposure, combined allocation, and the full overlap heatmap.
Every holding both funds own, ranked by shared exposure (how much of the position they hold in common). The weight gap shows which fund tilts more heavily into it.
| Holding | In IYW | In XLK | Weight gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 14.15% | 14.19% | 0.04%XLK |
| AAPLApple | 12.64% | 12.06% | 0.58%IYW |
| MSFTMicrosoft | 10.92% | 10.08% | 0.84%IYW |
| AVGOBROADCOM | 4.75% | 5.31% | 0.56%XLK |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 3.02% | 3.63% | 0.61%XLK |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 2.99% | 3.97% | 0.98%XLK |
| INTCINTEL | 2.17% | 3.04% | 0.87%XLK |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS | 2.07% | 2.74% | 0.67%XLK |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 1.89% | 2.56% | 0.67%XLK |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES A | 1.72% | 2.64% | 0.92%XLK |
| PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS | 1.44% | 2.05% | 0.61%XLK |
| KLACKLA | 1.25% | 1.72% | 0.47%XLK |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS | 1.25% | 1.68% | 0.43%XLK |
| ORCLORACLE | 1.22% | 1.62% | 0.40%XLK |
| IBMInternational Business Machines | 1.09% | 1.47% | 0.38%XLK |
| APHAMPHENOL CL A | 1.04% | 1.35% | 0.31%XLK |
| CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS A | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.46%XLK |
| ADIANALOG DEVICES | 0.91% | 1.24% | 0.33%XLK |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY | 0.91% | 1.22% | 0.31%XLK |
| SNDKSANDISK | 0.91% | 1.24% | 0.33%XLK |
| QCOMQUALCOMM | 0.84% | 1.13% | 0.29%XLK |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL | 0.76% | 0.99% | 0.23%XLK |
| CRMSALESFORCE | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.32%XLK |
| DELLDELL TECHNOLOGIES C | 0.65% | 0.84% | 0.19%XLK |
| GLWCORNING | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.20%XLK |
| NOWSERVICENOW | 0.60% | 0.87% | 0.27%XLK |
| ADBEADOBE | 0.52% | 0.70% | 0.18%XLK |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.18%XLK |
| CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYS | 0.46% | 0.59% | 0.13%XLK |
| INTUINTUIT | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.18%XLK |
| DDOGDATADOG CLASS A | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17%XLK |
| SNPSSYNOPSYS | 0.37% | 0.52% | 0.15%XLK |
| HPEHEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.13%XLK |
| MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.13%XLK |
| TERTERADYNE | 0.30% | 0.39% | 0.09%XLK |
| COHRCOHERENT | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13%XLK |
| ADSKAUTODESK | 0.25% | 0.35% | 0.10%XLK |
| FLEXFLEX LTD | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.08%XLK |
| MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY | 0.20% | 0.29% | 0.09%XLK |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.20% | 0.27% | 0.07%XLK |
| NTAPNETAPP | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.07%XLK |
| JBLJABIL | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.07%XLK |
| WDAYWORKDAY CLASS A | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.07%XLK |
| ONON SEMICONDUCTOR | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.06%XLK |
| QQNITY ELECTRONICS | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.05%XLK |
| CTSHCOGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS A | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.05%XLK |
| HPQHP | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.04%XLK |
| FFIVF5 | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.03%XLK |
| VRSNVERISIGN | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.03%XLK |
| CDWCDW CORP/DE | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.02%XLK |
| PTC | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.02%XLK |
| AKAMAKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.03%XLK |
| SMCISUPER MICRO COMPUTER | 0.08% | 0.12% | 0.04%XLK |
| GENGEN DIGITAL | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.04%XLK |
| GDDYGODADDY CLASS A | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.02%XLK |
| ITGARTNER | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.02%XLK |
| TYLTYLER TECHNOLOGIES | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.03%XLK |
| SWKSSKYWORKS SOLUTIONS | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.02%XLK |
1–20 of 58
How each fund's equity holdings break down by sector, side by side — the clearest read on where the two funds tilt differently.
| Sector | In IYW | In XLK |
|---|---|---|
Technology | 83.6% | 100.0% |
Communication Services | 15.1% | 0.0% |
Industrials | 0.6% | 0.0% |
Consumer Cyclical | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Financial Services | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Weights are of each fund’s classified equity holdings.
IYW
XLK
Two ETFs overlap when they hold the same underlying securities. Holding both funds can leave you more concentrated than you think — you may own the same large companies twice, at a combined weight neither fund shows on its own. The weight overlap above is the share of portfolio weight the two funds hold in common: for every security both own, it counts only the smaller of the two weights (the slice you genuinely double up on). 0% means completely different books; 100% means effectively identical funds.